黑料网

Objectivity is a weight-bearing pillar in scientific inquiry, a norm to ensure that research and its outcomes are 鈥渧alue free鈥� and unaffected by subjective value judgement. Yet ELSI research, as a field, is also poised to engage, take stands, and advocate for science-based policies and courses of actions that respond to societal needs. ELSI researchers and professional genetic associations face vexing questions about how to balance the two goals and responsibilities, especially amidst intense political polarization. What are the responsibilities of individuals and organizations involved in ELSI research? How are topics for collective policymaking selected, developed, and implemented? What are the limitations and challenges in building like-minded coalitions and influencing practice? What are the risks and benefits associated with advocacy in ELSI and the trade-offs between them? Building on real-world events, such as the Dobbs decision and Buffalo shooter鈥檚 manifesto, and statements by professional genetic organizations such as the American Society for Human Genetics and Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics, this webinar will explore the value, importance, upsides, and downsides of advocacy and allyship in ELSI research.Panelist: Kyle Brothers, MD, PhD (Norton Children鈥檚)
Panelist: Shoumita Dasgupta, PhD (Boston University School of Medicine)
Moderator: Robert Cook-Deegan, MD (Arizona State University)

Please join fellow audience members for an informal discussion in a Zoom meeting immediately following the forum. The link will be placed in the Zoom Chat during the forum. For those who cannot attend the live event, the forum will be recorded and archived on the ELSIhub Video page. Closed captioning will be provided for live and recorded events.

By registering for an ELSIhub event, attendees agree to abide by the ELSIhub Code of Conduct: https://elsihub.org/news/code-conduct